https://doi.org/10.4081/bmrsn.2023.23
Dire wolves and extinct curlews: are we failing at saving and communicating real biodiversity?
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
In an era of mass extinction, conservation requires an urgent triage - prioritizing species most at risk while redirecting resources from charismatic megafauna to overlooked taxa. Natural history museums are ideal places where this task could be explained to the general public and pursued. As a solution, they might adopt an “emergency room” approach, classifying species by threat level (e.g., “red code” for highly threatened taxa) to guide ethical conservation decisions. As taxonomists disappear and collections languish, this scientific triage becomes impossible without revitalized museum roles in research, education, and advocacy. The future of biodiversity hinges on recognizing that not all species can be saved, but strategic choices can prevent irreversible losses.
Downloads
CRediT authorship contribution
-Supporting Agencies
-Data Availability Statement
-How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.